Daniel et. al,
hier eine Galerie von Aufnahmen mit dem Bresser AR 102xs/460 - lt. Bresser identisch mit der Optik meines Polaris 102/460 - nur mit anderer Ausstattung:
https://www.astrobin.com/p3by4b/?nc=
https://stargazerslounge.com/t…-from-italy/?_fromLogin=1
Und falls es nicht der Bresser Polaris werden soll, dann vielleicht der Skywatcher MAK-90 ...
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">Zitat:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Conclusions
Never accept the mainstream lore without before giving a try to your wildest guesses.
Of course, most people usually prefer that others put their money where their original brainchildren are, so it is important that those who have made the experience make publicly available the results of their trials.
Perhaps not everybody likes to publish one’s failures, but when you get an unexpected success, it is all much easier …
Moreover putting together such a setup is (relatively to what is the standard in astrophotography) rather cheap: the small MAK may be bought for about 160 euro, the focal reducer costs less than 50 euro and the camera I use can be purchased for less than 400 euro.
All in all, with about 600 euro you can put together a surprisingly good and unexpected astrograph, so light at 1.8 kg with the camera, that any mount, even a light astrotracker, can cope with it.
And finally, for the same money, you also have, at his native length a quite good (for the aperture) lunar and planetary telescope, but this, of course, is what it was made for in the beginning.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
https://altazastropics.wordpre…he-unexpected-astrograph/
Gruß,
Peter
