Beiträge von Randolf im Thema „(23) Wie gut sind Zusatz-Optiken?“

    Hallo On-Boardies,
    hab mich jetzt endlich hier auch mal eingeloggt.
    Die Testergebnisse sollten diese sein:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tmboptical/message/6916


    Allerdings kommt mir die Reihenfolge etwas spanisch bzw. saarländisch vor.....
    Ich zitiere M.L.:


    "First results for sharpness and colorcorrection came out as follow


    Nr. 1.25" Zeiss Abbe ED Barlow 2x sharpest image, best colorcorrection
    Tele Vue 1.25" , 3 x , very good sharpness , colorfree, second best
    Skywatcher 1.25", 2 x ( Cheap Skywatcher) , very good sharpness, colorfree,
    third best
    Tele Vue 1.25" Powermate 2.5x, good sharpness, small colorerrors, fourth best
    Tele Vue 1.25", 2 x , good sharpness, small colorerrors, fourth best
    New Takahashi 1.25" , 2 x acceptable sharpness, nearly colorfree, fifth best
    Antares 1.25" Ultima 2x, lower sharpness, shows not best sharpness and
    colorcorrection, last place , this Antares is same as celestron Ultima
    Barlowlens


    The colorcorrection will be additional tested by Ronchi in douple pass sheme
    and the straylight will be tested now with phase contrast test



    In our last year made Zygo test the cheap chinese also showed superb results